Falls Sie nur an einem bestimmten Exempar interessiert sind, können Sie aus der folgenden Liste jenes wählen, an dem Sie interessiert sind:
Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
The Nature of Technological Knowledge. Are Models of Scientific Change Relevant? (Sociology of the Sciences - Monographs)
8 Angebote vergleichen
Preise | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2017 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Schnitt | € 90,16 | € 94,43 | € 150,53 | € 160,73 | € 159,50 |
Nachfrage |
Nature of Technological Knowledge. are Models of Scientific Change Relevant? (Paperback)
ISBN: 9789048183944 bzw. 9048183944, in Holländisch, Taschenbuch, neu, Erstausgabe.
Paperback. One of the ironies of our time is the sparsity of useful analytic tools for understanding change and development within technology itself. For all the diatribes about.Shipping may be from our UK, US or Australian warehouse depending on stock availability. This item is printed on demand. 154 pages. 0.243.
The Nature of Technological Knowledge. Are Models of Scientific Change Relevant?
ISBN: 9789048183944 bzw. 9048183944, in Holländisch, Springer Netherlands, Taschenbuch, neu.
buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG, [1].
One of the ironies of our time is the sparsity of useful analytic tools for understanding change and development within technology itself. For all the diatribes about the disastrous effects of technology on modern life, for all the equally uncritical paeans to technology as the panacea for human ills, the vociferous pro- and anti-technology movements have failed to illuminate the nature of technology. On a more scholarly level, in the midst of claims by Marxists and non-Marxists alike about the technological underpinnings of the major social and economic changes of the last couple of centuries, and despite advice given to government and industry about managing science and technology by a small army of consultants and policy analysts, technology itself remains locked inside an impenetrable black box, a deus ex machina to be invoked when all other explanations of puzzling social and economic pheoomena fail. The discipline that has probably done most to penetrate that black box in recent years by studying the 1 internal development of technology is history. Historians of technology and certain economic historians have carried out careful and detailed studies on the genesis and impact of technological innovations, and the structu-re of the social systems associated with those innovations. Within the past few decades tentative consensus about the periodization and the major traditions within the history of technology has begun to emerge, at least as far as Britain and America in the eighteenth and nineteenth century are concerned.Softcover reprint of hardcover 1st ed. 1984. 2010. vii, 147 S. 1 SW-Abb.,. 229 mmVersandfertig in 3-5 Tagen, Softcover.
The Nature of Technological Knowledge, Are Models of Scientific Change Relevant? (1984)
ISBN: 9789027717160 bzw. 9027717168, in Holländisch, Springer, gebundenes Buch, neu.
bol.com.
One of the ironies of our time is the sparsity of useful analytic tools for understanding change and development within technology itself. For all the diatribes about the disastrous effects of technology on modern life, for all the equally uncritical paeans to technology as the panacea for human ills, the vociferous pro- and anti-technology movements have failed to illuminate the nature of technology. On a more scholarly level, in the midst of claims by Marxists and non-Marxists alike about the ... One of the ironies of our time is the sparsity of useful analytic tools for understanding change and development within technology itself. For all the diatribes about the disastrous effects of technology on modern life, for all the equally uncritical paeans to technology as the panacea for human ills, the vociferous pro- and anti-technology movements have failed to illuminate the nature of technology. On a more scholarly level, in the midst of claims by Marxists and non-Marxists alike about the technological underpinnings of the major social and economic changes of the last couple of centuries, and despite advice given to government and industry about managing science and technology by a small army of consultants and policy analysts, technology itself remains locked inside an impenetrable black box, a deus ex machina to be invoked when all other explanations of puzzling social and economic pheoomena fail. The discipline that has probably done most to penetrate that black box in recent years by studying the 1 internal development of technology is history. Historians of technology and certain economic historians have carried out careful and detailed studies on the genesis and impact of technological innovations, and the structu-re of the social systems associated with those innovations. Within the past few decades tentative consensus about the periodization and the major traditions within the history of technology has begun to emerge, at least as far as Britain and America in the eighteenth and nineteenth century are concerned. Productinformatie:Taal: Engels;Afmetingen: 11x235x155 mm;Gewicht: 405,00 gram;Druk: 1;ISBN10: 9027717168;ISBN13: 9789027717160; Engels | Hardcover | 1984.
The Nature of Technological Knowledge. Are Models of Scientific Change Relevant? (Sociology of the Sciences - Monographs) (2010)
ISBN: 9789048183944 bzw. 9048183944, in Englisch, 147 Seiten, Springer, Taschenbuch, gebraucht.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, allnewbooks.
One of the ironies of our time is the sparsity of useful analytic tools for understanding change and development within technology itself. For all the diatribes about the disastrous effects of technology on modern life, for all the equally uncritical paeans to technology as the panacea for human ills, the vociferous pro- and anti-technology movements have failed to illuminate the nature of technology. On a more scholarly level, in the midst of claims by Marxists and non-Marxists alike about the technological underpinnings of the major social and economic changes of the last couple of centuries, and despite advice given to government and industry about managing science and technology by a small army of consultants and policy analysts, technology itself remains locked inside an impenetrable black box, a deus ex machina to be invoked when all other explanations of puzzling social and economic pheoomena fail. The discipline that has probably done most to penetrate that black box in recent years by studying the 1 internal development of technology is history. Historians of technology and certain economic historians have carried out careful and detailed studies on the genesis and impact of technological innovations, and the structu-re of the social systems associated with those innovations. Within the past few decades tentative consensus about the periodization and the major traditions within the history of technology has begun to emerge, at least as far as Britain and America in the eighteenth and nineteenth century are concerned. Paperback, Ausgabe: Softcover reprint of hardcover 1st ed. 1984, Label: Springer, Springer, Produktgruppe: Book, Publiziert: 2010-12-22, Freigegeben: 2010-12-25, Studio: Springer, Verkaufsrang: 12563063.
The Nature of Technological Knowledge. Are Models of Scientific Change Relevant? (Paperback) (2010)
ISBN: 9789048183944 bzw. 9048183944, in Holländisch, Springer, Netherlands, Taschenbuch, neu, Nachdruck.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, The Book Depository US [58762574], Gloucester, ., United Kingdom.
Language: English Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****. One of the ironies of our time is the sparsity of useful analytic tools for understanding change and development within technology itself. For all the diatribes about the disastrous effects of technology on modern life, for all the equally uncritical paeans to technology as the panacea for human ills, the vociferous pro- and anti-technology movements have failed to illuminate the nature of technology. On a more scholarly level, in the midst of claims by Marxists and non-Marxists alike about the technological underpinnings of the major social and economic changes of the last couple of centuries, and despite advice given to government and industry about managing science and technology by a small army of consultants and policy analysts, technology itself remains locked inside an impenetrable black box, a deus ex machina to be invoked when all other explanations of puzzling social and economic pheoomena fail. The discipline that has probably done most to penetrate that black box in recent years by studying the 1 internal development of technology is history. Historians of technology and certain economic historians have carried out careful and detailed studies on the genesis and impact of technological innovations, and the structu-re of the social systems associated with those innovations. Within the past few decades tentative consensus about the periodization and the major traditions within the history of technology has begun to emerge, at least as far as Britain and America in the eighteenth and nineteenth century are concerned.
The Nature of Technological Knowledge. Are Models of Scientific Change Relevant? (Sociology of the Sciences - Monographs) (1984)
ISBN: 9789027717160 bzw. 9027717168, in Englisch, 160 Seiten, 1984. Ausgabe, Springer, gebundenes Buch, neu.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, tablet_books.
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen
The Nature of Technological Knowledge. Are Models of Scientific Change Relevant? (Sociology of the Sciences - Monographs) (1984)
ISBN: 9789027717160 bzw. 9027717168, in Englisch, 160 Seiten, 1984. Ausgabe, Springer, gebundenes Buch, gebraucht.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, reusabook.
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen
The Nature of Technological Knowledge. Are Models of Scientific Change Relevant?
ISBN: 9789048183944 bzw. 9048183944, in Holländisch, Springer, neu.
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen