Von dem Buch Changing Minds or Changing Channels?: Partisan News in an Age of Choice (Chicago Studies in American Politics) haben wir 3 gleiche oder sehr ähnliche Ausgaben identifiziert!
Falls Sie nur an einem bestimmten Exempar interessiert sind, können Sie aus der folgenden Liste jenes wählen, an dem Sie interessiert sind:
100%: Martin Johnson, Kevin Arceneaux: Changing Minds or Changing Channels?: Partisan News in an Age of Choice (Chicago Studies in American Politics) (ISBN: 9780226047447) 2013, University Of Chicago Press, Erstausgabe, in Englisch, auch als eBook.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
100%: Christine Etherington-Wright: Changing Minds or Changing Channels? : Partisan News in an Age of Choice (ISBN: 9780226047270) in Englisch, Broschiert.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
91%: Kevin Arceneaux, Contributor: Martin Johnson: Changing Minds or Changing Channels?: Partisan News In An Age Of Choice (Chicago Studies in American Politics) (Paperback) (ISBN: 9780226047300) 2013, University of Chicago Press, Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, in Englisch, Taschenbuch.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
Changing Minds or Changing Channels?: Partisan News in an Age of Choice (Chicago Studies in American Politics)
11 Angebote vergleichen
Bester Preis: € 21,28 (vom 10.06.2016)1
Changing Minds or Changing Channels? Partisan News in an Age of Choice (2013)
EN NW EBISBN: 9780226047447 bzw. 022604744X, in Englisch, University Of Chicago Press, neu, E-Book.
Lieferung aus: Niederlande, Direct beschikbaar.
bol.com.
We live in an age of media saturation, where with a few clicks of the remote—or mouse—we can tune in to programming where the facts fit our ideological predispositions. But what are the political consequences of this vast landscape of media choice? Partisan news has been roundly castigated for reinforcing prior beliefs and contributing to the highly polarized political environment we have today, but there is little evidence to support this claim, and much of what we know about the impact of news... We live in an age of media saturation, where with a few clicks of the remote—or mouse—we can tune in to programming where the facts fit our ideological predispositions. But what are the political consequences of this vast landscape of media choice? Partisan news has been roundly castigated for reinforcing prior beliefs and contributing to the highly polarized political environment we have today, but there is little evidence to support this claim, and much of what we know about the impact of news media come from studies that were conducted at a time when viewers chose from among six channels rather than scores. Through a series of innovative experiments, Kevin Arceneaux and Martin Johnson show that such criticism is unfounded. Americans who watch cable news are already polarized, and their exposure to partisan programming of their choice has little influence on their political positions. In fact, the opposite is true: viewers become more polarized when forced to watch programming that opposes their beliefs. A much more troubling consequence of the ever-expanding media environment, the authors show, is that it has allowed people to tune out the news: the four top-rated partisan news programs draw a mere three percent of the total number of people watching television. Overturning much of the conventional wisdom, Changing Minds or Changing Channels? demonstrate that the strong effects of media exposure found in past research are simply not applicable in today’s more saturated media landscape. Productinformatie:Taal: Engels;Formaat: ePub met kopieerbeveiliging (DRM) van Adobe;Kopieerrechten: Het kopiëren van (delen van) de pagina's is niet toegestaan ;Geschikt voor: Alle e-readers te koop bij bol.com (of compatible met Adobe DRM). Telefoons/tablets met Google Android (1.6 of hoger) voorzien van bol.com boekenbol app. PC en Mac met Adobe reader software;ISBN10: 022604744X;ISBN13: 9780226047447; Engels | Ebook | 2013.
bol.com.
We live in an age of media saturation, where with a few clicks of the remote—or mouse—we can tune in to programming where the facts fit our ideological predispositions. But what are the political consequences of this vast landscape of media choice? Partisan news has been roundly castigated for reinforcing prior beliefs and contributing to the highly polarized political environment we have today, but there is little evidence to support this claim, and much of what we know about the impact of news... We live in an age of media saturation, where with a few clicks of the remote—or mouse—we can tune in to programming where the facts fit our ideological predispositions. But what are the political consequences of this vast landscape of media choice? Partisan news has been roundly castigated for reinforcing prior beliefs and contributing to the highly polarized political environment we have today, but there is little evidence to support this claim, and much of what we know about the impact of news media come from studies that were conducted at a time when viewers chose from among six channels rather than scores. Through a series of innovative experiments, Kevin Arceneaux and Martin Johnson show that such criticism is unfounded. Americans who watch cable news are already polarized, and their exposure to partisan programming of their choice has little influence on their political positions. In fact, the opposite is true: viewers become more polarized when forced to watch programming that opposes their beliefs. A much more troubling consequence of the ever-expanding media environment, the authors show, is that it has allowed people to tune out the news: the four top-rated partisan news programs draw a mere three percent of the total number of people watching television. Overturning much of the conventional wisdom, Changing Minds or Changing Channels? demonstrate that the strong effects of media exposure found in past research are simply not applicable in today’s more saturated media landscape. Productinformatie:Taal: Engels;Formaat: ePub met kopieerbeveiliging (DRM) van Adobe;Kopieerrechten: Het kopiëren van (delen van) de pagina's is niet toegestaan ;Geschikt voor: Alle e-readers te koop bij bol.com (of compatible met Adobe DRM). Telefoons/tablets met Google Android (1.6 of hoger) voorzien van bol.com boekenbol app. PC en Mac met Adobe reader software;ISBN10: 022604744X;ISBN13: 9780226047447; Engels | Ebook | 2013.
2
Changing Minds or Changing Channels?
EN NWISBN: 9780226047270 bzw. 022604727X, in Englisch, University of Chicago Press, United States of America, neu.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigtes Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland, in-stock.
We live in an age of media saturation, where with a few clicks of the remote or mouse we can tune in to programming where the facts fit our ideological predispositions. But what are the political consequences of this vast landscape of media choice? Partisan news has been roundly castigated for reinforcing prior beliefs and contributing to the highly polarized political environment we have today, but there is little evidence to support this claim, and much of what we know about the impact of news media come from studies that were conducted at a time when viewers chose from among six channels rather than scores. Through a series of innovative experiments, Kevin Arceneaux and Martin Johnson show that such criticism is unfounded. Americans who watch cable news are already polarized, and their exposure to partisan programming of their choice has little influence on their political positions. In fact, the opposite is true: viewers become more polarized when forced to watch programming that opposes their beliefs. A much more troubling consequence of the ever-expanding media environment, the authors show, is that it has allowed people to tune out the news: the four top-rated partisan news programs draw a mere three percent of the total number of people watching television. Overturning much of the conventional wisdom, Changing Minds or Changing Channels? demonstrate that the strong effects of media exposure found in past research are simply not applicable in today s more saturated media landscape.
We live in an age of media saturation, where with a few clicks of the remote or mouse we can tune in to programming where the facts fit our ideological predispositions. But what are the political consequences of this vast landscape of media choice? Partisan news has been roundly castigated for reinforcing prior beliefs and contributing to the highly polarized political environment we have today, but there is little evidence to support this claim, and much of what we know about the impact of news media come from studies that were conducted at a time when viewers chose from among six channels rather than scores. Through a series of innovative experiments, Kevin Arceneaux and Martin Johnson show that such criticism is unfounded. Americans who watch cable news are already polarized, and their exposure to partisan programming of their choice has little influence on their political positions. In fact, the opposite is true: viewers become more polarized when forced to watch programming that opposes their beliefs. A much more troubling consequence of the ever-expanding media environment, the authors show, is that it has allowed people to tune out the news: the four top-rated partisan news programs draw a mere three percent of the total number of people watching television. Overturning much of the conventional wisdom, Changing Minds or Changing Channels? demonstrate that the strong effects of media exposure found in past research are simply not applicable in today s more saturated media landscape.
3
Changing Minds or Changing Channels? Partisan News in an Age of Choice (2013)
EN PB NWISBN: 9780226047300 bzw. 022604730X, in Englisch, The University Of Chicago Press, Taschenbuch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Niederlande, 5-10 werkdagen.
bol.com.
We live in an age of media saturation, where with a few clicks of the remote - or mouse - we can tune in to programming where the facts fit our ideological predispositions. But what are the political consequences of this vast landscape of media choice? Partisan news has been roundly castigated for reinforcing prior beliefs and contributing to the highly polarized political environment we have today, but there is little evidence to support this claim, and much of what we know about the impact of ... We live in an age of media saturation, where with a few clicks of the remote - or mouse - we can tune in to programming where the facts fit our ideological predispositions. But what are the political consequences of this vast landscape of media choice? Partisan news has been roundly castigated for reinforcing prior beliefs and contributing to the highly polarized political environment we have today, but there is little evidence to support this claim, and much of what we know about the impact of news media come from studies that were conducted at a time when viewers chose from among six channels rather than scores. Through a series of innovative experiments, Kevin Arceneaux and Martin Johnson show that such criticism is unfounded. Americans who watch cable news are already polarized, and their exposure to partisan programming of their choice does not significantly change their initial position. In fact, the opposite is true: viewers become more polarized when forced to watch programming that opposes their beliefs. A much more troubling consequence of the ever-expanding media environment, the authors show, is that it has allowed people to tune out the news: the four top-rated partisan news programs draw a mere three percent of the total number of people watching television. Overturning much of the conventional wisdom, Changing Minds or Changing Channels? demonstrates that the strong effects of media exposure found in past research are simply not applicable in today's more saturated media landscape.Soort: Met illustraties;Taal: Engels;Afmetingen: 15x229x152 mm;Gewicht: 363,00 gram;Verschijningsdatum: september 2013;Druk: 1;ISBN10: 022604730X;ISBN13: 9780226047300; Engelstalig | Paperback | 2013.
bol.com.
We live in an age of media saturation, where with a few clicks of the remote - or mouse - we can tune in to programming where the facts fit our ideological predispositions. But what are the political consequences of this vast landscape of media choice? Partisan news has been roundly castigated for reinforcing prior beliefs and contributing to the highly polarized political environment we have today, but there is little evidence to support this claim, and much of what we know about the impact of ... We live in an age of media saturation, where with a few clicks of the remote - or mouse - we can tune in to programming where the facts fit our ideological predispositions. But what are the political consequences of this vast landscape of media choice? Partisan news has been roundly castigated for reinforcing prior beliefs and contributing to the highly polarized political environment we have today, but there is little evidence to support this claim, and much of what we know about the impact of news media come from studies that were conducted at a time when viewers chose from among six channels rather than scores. Through a series of innovative experiments, Kevin Arceneaux and Martin Johnson show that such criticism is unfounded. Americans who watch cable news are already polarized, and their exposure to partisan programming of their choice does not significantly change their initial position. In fact, the opposite is true: viewers become more polarized when forced to watch programming that opposes their beliefs. A much more troubling consequence of the ever-expanding media environment, the authors show, is that it has allowed people to tune out the news: the four top-rated partisan news programs draw a mere three percent of the total number of people watching television. Overturning much of the conventional wisdom, Changing Minds or Changing Channels? demonstrates that the strong effects of media exposure found in past research are simply not applicable in today's more saturated media landscape.Soort: Met illustraties;Taal: Engels;Afmetingen: 15x229x152 mm;Gewicht: 363,00 gram;Verschijningsdatum: september 2013;Druk: 1;ISBN10: 022604730X;ISBN13: 9780226047300; Engelstalig | Paperback | 2013.
4
Changing Minds or Changing Channels?: Partisan News in an Age of Choice (Chicago Studies in American Politics) (2013)
EN NW FE EB DLISBN: 9780226047447 bzw. 022604744X, in Englisch, 244 Seiten, University of Chicago Press, neu, Erstausgabe, E-Book, elektronischer Download.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigtes Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland, E-Book zum Download, Versandkostenfrei.
We live in an age of media saturation, where with a few clicks of the remote—or mouse—we can tune in to programming where the facts fit our ideological predispositions. But what are the political consequences of this vast landscape of media choice? Partisan news has been roundly castigated for reinforcing prior beliefs and contributing to the highly polarized political environment we have today, but there is little evidence to support this claim, and much of what we know about the impact of news media come from studies that were conducted at a time when viewers chose from among six channels rather than scores. Through a series of innovative experiments, Kevin Arceneaux and Martin Johnson show that such criticism is unfounded. Americans who watch cable news are already polarized, and their exposure to partisan programming of their choice has little influence on their political positions. In fact, the opposite is true: viewers become more polarized when forced to watch programming that opposes their beliefs. A much more troubling consequence of the ever-expanding media environment, the authors show, is that it has allowed people to tune out the news: the four top-rated partisan news programs draw a mere three percent of the total number of people watching television. Overturning much of the conventional wisdom, Changing Minds or Changing Channels? demonstrate that the strong effects of media exposure found in past research are simply not applicable in today’s more saturated media landscape. , Kindle Edition, Ausgabe: 1, Format: Kindle eBook, Label: University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, Produktgruppe: eBooks, Publiziert: 2013-08-27, Freigegeben: 2013-08-27, Studio: University of Chicago Press.
We live in an age of media saturation, where with a few clicks of the remote—or mouse—we can tune in to programming where the facts fit our ideological predispositions. But what are the political consequences of this vast landscape of media choice? Partisan news has been roundly castigated for reinforcing prior beliefs and contributing to the highly polarized political environment we have today, but there is little evidence to support this claim, and much of what we know about the impact of news media come from studies that were conducted at a time when viewers chose from among six channels rather than scores. Through a series of innovative experiments, Kevin Arceneaux and Martin Johnson show that such criticism is unfounded. Americans who watch cable news are already polarized, and their exposure to partisan programming of their choice has little influence on their political positions. In fact, the opposite is true: viewers become more polarized when forced to watch programming that opposes their beliefs. A much more troubling consequence of the ever-expanding media environment, the authors show, is that it has allowed people to tune out the news: the four top-rated partisan news programs draw a mere three percent of the total number of people watching television. Overturning much of the conventional wisdom, Changing Minds or Changing Channels? demonstrate that the strong effects of media exposure found in past research are simply not applicable in today’s more saturated media landscape. , Kindle Edition, Ausgabe: 1, Format: Kindle eBook, Label: University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, Produktgruppe: eBooks, Publiziert: 2013-08-27, Freigegeben: 2013-08-27, Studio: University of Chicago Press.
5
Changing Minds or Changing Channels?: Partisan News in an Age of Choice
~EN USISBN: 9780226047300 bzw. 022604730X, vermutlich in Englisch, University of Chicago Press, Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, gebraucht.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Lagernd, zzgl. Versandkosten.
We live in an age of media saturation, where with a few clicks of the remote - or mouse - we can tune in to programming where the facts fit our ideological predispositions. This title demonstrates that the strong effects of media exposure found in past research are simply not applicable in today's more saturated media landscape.
We live in an age of media saturation, where with a few clicks of the remote - or mouse - we can tune in to programming where the facts fit our ideological predispositions. This title demonstrates that the strong effects of media exposure found in past research are simply not applicable in today's more saturated media landscape.
6
Changing Minds or Changing Channels? : Partisan News in an Age of Choice
EN PB NWISBN: 9780226047270 bzw. 022604727X, in Englisch, Palgrave Macmillan, Taschenbuch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigtes Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland, Despatched same working day before 3pm.
We live in an age of media saturation, where with a few clicks of the remote - or mouse - we can tune in to programming where the facts fit our ideological predispositions.This title demonstrates that the strong effects of media exposure found in past research are simply not applicable in today's more saturated media landscape.
We live in an age of media saturation, where with a few clicks of the remote - or mouse - we can tune in to programming where the facts fit our ideological predispositions.This title demonstrates that the strong effects of media exposure found in past research are simply not applicable in today's more saturated media landscape.
7
Changing Minds or Changing Channels?: Partisan News in an Age of Choice
EN HC NWISBN: 9780226047270 bzw. 022604727X, in Englisch, University of Chicago Press, gebundenes Buch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, In Stock.
Changing-Minds-or-Changing-Channels~~Kevin-Arceneaux, Changing Minds or Changing Channels?: Partisan News in an Age of Choice, Hardcover.
Changing-Minds-or-Changing-Channels~~Kevin-Arceneaux, Changing Minds or Changing Channels?: Partisan News in an Age of Choice, Hardcover.
8
Symbolbild
Changing Minds or Changing Channels?: Partisan News In An Age Of Choice (Chicago Studies in American Politics) (2013)
EN PB NWISBN: 9780226047300 bzw. 022604730X, in Englisch, University of Chicago Press, Taschenbuch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigtes Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland, Versandkosten nach: DEU.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, El Pinarillo Books.
University of Chicago Press, 2013. Book. New. Paperback. New and in stock.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, El Pinarillo Books.
University of Chicago Press, 2013. Book. New. Paperback. New and in stock.
9
Symbolbild
Changing Minds or Changing Channels?: Partisan News in an Age of Choice (2013)
EN PB USISBN: 9780226047300 bzw. 022604730X, in Englisch, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Il, Taschenbuch, gebraucht.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, zzgl. Versandkosten, Verandgebiet: DOM.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, GreatBookPrices, IL, Waukegan, [RE:4].
Trade paperback.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, GreatBookPrices, IL, Waukegan, [RE:4].
Trade paperback.
10
Symbolbild
Changing Minds or Changing Channels?: Partisan News in an Age of Choice (2013)
EN PB NWISBN: 9780226047300 bzw. 022604730X, in Englisch, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Il, Taschenbuch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, zzgl. Versandkosten, Verandgebiet: STOCKNEW.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Alibris, NV, Sparks, [RE:5].
Trade paperback.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Alibris, NV, Sparks, [RE:5].
Trade paperback.
Lade…