Structured Testing - 5 Angebote vergleichen
Bester Preis: € 19,62 (vom 30.11.2017)1
Symbolbild
Structured Testing (1983)
EN PB NW RPISBN: 9781235271809 bzw. 1235271803, in Englisch, RareBooksClub, Taschenbuch, neu, Nachdruck.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Free shipping.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, BuySomeBooks [52360437], Las Vegas, NV, U.S.A.
This item is printed on demand. 58 pages. Dimensions: 9.4in. x 7.2in. x 0.2in.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1983-10 Excerpt: . . . nine programs from Experiment 1. Complexity of control flow: Control flow structures at three levels of complexity were defined for each program in both experiments. Table I presents a summary of the constructs allowed under each type of control flow. The constructs allowed under structured control flow were generally consistent with the principles of structured programming described by Dijkstra 18When the rules for structured programming are applied 1 Although this type of control flow is referred to as structured, the designation refers to standard Fortran IV and does not imply the use of a special compiler with rp-Then-else, Do-while, or Do-until constructs. These structures were not available on the system used. rigorously, awkward constructions may occur in standard Fortran, such as Do loops with dummy indices 19. In a second version of each program, these awkward constructions were largely eliminated with a more naturally structured control flow. These conventions included multiple returns and judiciously used backward Go Tos. In the unstructured version of each program the control flow was not straightforward. Expanded Do loops, arithmetic Ifs, and unrestricted use of Go Tos were allowed. Variable name mnemonicity: In Experiment 1, three levels of mnemonicity for variable names were manipulated independently of program structure. Several nonparticipants were shown the programs and asked to assign names to the variables. The names chosen most frequently were used in the most mnemonic condition. The medium level consisted of less frequently chosen names. In the least mnemonic condition, names consisted of one or two alphanumeric characters. Comments: Three levels of commenting were manipulated in Experiment 2: global, in-line, and none. Global co. . . This item ships from La Vergne,TN.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, BuySomeBooks [52360437], Las Vegas, NV, U.S.A.
This item is printed on demand. 58 pages. Dimensions: 9.4in. x 7.2in. x 0.2in.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1983-10 Excerpt: . . . nine programs from Experiment 1. Complexity of control flow: Control flow structures at three levels of complexity were defined for each program in both experiments. Table I presents a summary of the constructs allowed under each type of control flow. The constructs allowed under structured control flow were generally consistent with the principles of structured programming described by Dijkstra 18When the rules for structured programming are applied 1 Although this type of control flow is referred to as structured, the designation refers to standard Fortran IV and does not imply the use of a special compiler with rp-Then-else, Do-while, or Do-until constructs. These structures were not available on the system used. rigorously, awkward constructions may occur in standard Fortran, such as Do loops with dummy indices 19. In a second version of each program, these awkward constructions were largely eliminated with a more naturally structured control flow. These conventions included multiple returns and judiciously used backward Go Tos. In the unstructured version of each program the control flow was not straightforward. Expanded Do loops, arithmetic Ifs, and unrestricted use of Go Tos were allowed. Variable name mnemonicity: In Experiment 1, three levels of mnemonicity for variable names were manipulated independently of program structure. Several nonparticipants were shown the programs and asked to assign names to the variables. The names chosen most frequently were used in the most mnemonic condition. The medium level consisted of less frequently chosen names. In the least mnemonic condition, names consisted of one or two alphanumeric characters. Comments: Three levels of commenting were manipulated in Experiment 2: global, in-line, and none. Global co. . . This item ships from La Vergne,TN.
2
Structured Testing (2012)
EN PB NWISBN: 9781235271809 bzw. 1235271803, in Englisch, 58 Seiten, RareBooksClub.com, Taschenbuch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Usually ships in 1-2 business days, Real shipping costs can differ.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, super_star_seller.
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1983-10 Excerpt: ...nine programs from Experiment 1. Complexity of control flow: Control flow structures at three levels of complexity were defined for each program in both experiments. Table I presents a summary of the constructs allowed under each type of control flow. The constructs allowed under structured control flow were generally consistent with the principles of structured programming described by Dijkstra 18When the rules for structured programming are applied 1 Although this type of control flow is referred to as structured, the designation refers to standard Fortran IV and does not imply the use of a special compiler with rp-Then-else, Do-while, or Do-until constructs. These structures were not available on the system used. rigorously, awkward constructions may occur in standard Fortran, such as Do loops with dummy indices 19. In a second version of each program, these awkward constructions were largely eliminated with a more naturally structured control flow. These conventions included multiple returns and judiciously used backward Go To'S. In the unstructured version of each program the control flow was not straightforward. Expanded Do loops, arithmetic If's, and unrestricted use of Go To's were allowed. Variable name mnemonicity: In Experiment 1, three levels of mnemonicity for variable names were manipulated independently of program structure. Several nonparticipants were shown the programs and asked to assign names to the variables. The names chosen most frequently were used in the most mnemonic condition. The medium level consisted of less frequently chosen names. In the least mnemonic condition, names consisted of one or two alphanumeric characters. Comments: Three levels of commenting were manipulated in Experiment 2: global, in-line, and none. Global co... Paperback, Label: RareBooksClub.com, RareBooksClub.com, Product group: Book, Published: 2012-05-14, Studio: RareBooksClub.com, Sales rank: 15135531.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, super_star_seller.
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1983-10 Excerpt: ...nine programs from Experiment 1. Complexity of control flow: Control flow structures at three levels of complexity were defined for each program in both experiments. Table I presents a summary of the constructs allowed under each type of control flow. The constructs allowed under structured control flow were generally consistent with the principles of structured programming described by Dijkstra 18When the rules for structured programming are applied 1 Although this type of control flow is referred to as structured, the designation refers to standard Fortran IV and does not imply the use of a special compiler with rp-Then-else, Do-while, or Do-until constructs. These structures were not available on the system used. rigorously, awkward constructions may occur in standard Fortran, such as Do loops with dummy indices 19. In a second version of each program, these awkward constructions were largely eliminated with a more naturally structured control flow. These conventions included multiple returns and judiciously used backward Go To'S. In the unstructured version of each program the control flow was not straightforward. Expanded Do loops, arithmetic If's, and unrestricted use of Go To's were allowed. Variable name mnemonicity: In Experiment 1, three levels of mnemonicity for variable names were manipulated independently of program structure. Several nonparticipants were shown the programs and asked to assign names to the variables. The names chosen most frequently were used in the most mnemonic condition. The medium level consisted of less frequently chosen names. In the least mnemonic condition, names consisted of one or two alphanumeric characters. Comments: Three levels of commenting were manipulated in Experiment 2: global, in-line, and none. Global co... Paperback, Label: RareBooksClub.com, RareBooksClub.com, Product group: Book, Published: 2012-05-14, Studio: RareBooksClub.com, Sales rank: 15135531.
Lade…