The Bible Dictionary (Paperback) - 5 Angebote vergleichen

Von Händler/Antiquariat, BuySomeBooks [52360437], Las Vegas, NV, U.S.A.
This item is printed on demand. Paperback. 576 pages. Dimensions: 9.7in. x 7.4in. x 1.2in.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1875 Excerpt: . . . argument. The promise made to him Matt. xvi. 19 is afterwards repeated to all the apostles Matt, xviii. IS; John xx. 23, showing that he was simply addressed by Christ as the representative of all the rest, and that no peculiar influence or authority was meant to be conferred on him above his brethren. As was to be expected, not a few spurious works were in after times given to the world in the name of this celebrated apostle. The Gospel of Peter, The Acts of Peter, The Apocalypse of Peter, and c, are specimens of these fabrications; but none of the writings bearing his name have the slightest claim to be esteemed genuine except the two canonical epistles. Peter, First Epistle Of. The authenticity of this epistle cannot on any reasonable grounds be questioned. It is ranked by Eusebius Hist. Eccl. , iii. 3, 23 among the Homologoumena, those books of Scripture which all acknowledged. The same historian tells us iii. 39; iv. 14 that it was quoted both by Polycarp and Papias; and in the existing epistle of Polycarp to the Philippians we find many passages chap, i. , 1 Peter i. 8: ii. , 1 Peter i. 21; iii. 9, and c to justify the statement The First Epistle of Peter has always formed part of the Syriac Peshito, the most ancient version of the New Testament in existence. It is also clearly referred to in the second epistle ascribed to the same apostle 2 Peter iii. 1; and even those critics who deny tho authenticity of this latter epistle, admit that its evidence is conclusive in favour of tho first, inasmuch as its composition can by no hypothesis be placed later than the beginning of the second century. There does not seem, in fact, ever to have been any question raised in the Church respecting the genu. . . This item ships from La Vergne,TN.

Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Usually ships in 1-2 business days.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, profnath.
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1875 Excerpt: ...argument. The promise made to him Matt. xvi. 19 is afterwards repeated to all the apostles Matt, xviii. IS; John xx. 23, showing that he was simply addressed by Christ as the representative of all the rest, and that no peculiar influence or authority was meant to be conferred on him above his brethren. As was to be expected, not a few spurious works were in after times given to the world in the name of this celebrated apostle. "The Gospel of Peter," "The Acts of Peter," "The Apocalypse of Peter," &c, are specimens of these fabrications; but none of the writings bearing his name have the slightest claim to be esteemed genuine except the two canonical epistles. Peter, First Epistle Of. The authenticity of this epistle cannot on any reasonable grounds be questioned. It is ranked by Eusebius " Hist. Eccl.," iii. 3, 23 among the "Homologoumena," those books of Scripture which all acknowledged. The same historian tells us iii. 39; iv. 14 that it was quoted both by Polycarp and Papias; and in the existing epistle of Polycarp to the Philippians we find many passages chap, i., 1 Peter i. 8: ii., 1 Peter i. 21; iii. 9, &c to justify the statement The First Epistle of Peter has always formed part of the Syriac Peshito, the most ancient version of the New Testament in existence. It is also clearly referred to in the second epistle ascribed to the same apostle 2 Peter iii. 1; and even those critics who deny tho authenticity of this latter epistle, admit that its evidence is conclusive in favour of tho first, inasmuch as its composition can by no hypothesis be placed later than the beginning of the second century. There does not seem, in fact, ever to have been any question raised in the Church respecting the genu... Paperback, Label: RareBooksClub.com, RareBooksClub.com, Produktgruppe: Book, Publiziert: 2012-05-17, Studio: RareBooksClub.com.

Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Versandkostenfrei.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, The Book Depository US [58762574], Gloucester, ., United Kingdom.
Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****. This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1875 Excerpt: .argument. The promise made to him Matt. xvi. 19 is afterwards repeated to all the apostles Matt, xviii. IS; John xx. 23, showing that he was simply addressed by Christ as the representative of all the rest, and that no peculiar influence or authority was meant to be conferred on him above his brethren. As was to be expected, not a few spurious works were in after times given to the world in the name of this celebrated apostle. The Gospel of Peter, The Acts of Peter, The Apocalypse of Peter, c, are specimens of these fabrications; but none of the writings bearing his name have the slightest claim to be esteemed genuine except the two canonical epistles. Peter, First Epistle Of. The authenticity of this epistle cannot on any reasonable grounds be questioned. It is ranked by Eusebius Hist. Eccl., iii. 3, 23 among the Homologoumena, those books of Scripture which all acknowledged. The same historian tells us iii. 39; iv. 14 that it was quoted both by Polycarp and Papias; and in the existing epistle of Polycarp to the Philippians we find many passages chap, i., 1 Peter i. 8: ii., 1 Peter i. 21; iii. 9, c to justify the statement The First Epistle of Peter has always formed part of the Syriac Peshito, the most ancient version of the New Testament in existence. It is also clearly referred to in the second epistle ascribed to the same apostle 2 Peter iii. 1; and even those critics who deny tho authenticity of this latter epistle, admit that its evidence is conclusive in favour of tho first, inasmuch as its composition can by no hypothesis be placed later than the beginning of the second century. There does not seem, in fact, ever to have been any question raised in the Church respecting the genu.

Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Versandkostenfrei.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, The Book Depository US [58762574], Slough, United Kingdom.
Language: English Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****. This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1875 Excerpt: .argument. The promise made to him Matt. xvi. 19 is afterwards repeated to all the apostles Matt, xviii. IS; John xx. 23, showing that he was simply addressed by Christ as the representative of all the rest, and that no peculiar influence or authority was meant to be conferred on him above his brethren. As was to be expected, not a few spurious works were in after times given to the world in the name of this celebrated apostle. The Gospel of Peter, The Acts of Peter, The Apocalypse of Peter, c, are specimens of these fabrications; but none of the writings bearing his name have the slightest claim to be esteemed genuine except the two canonical epistles. Peter, First Epistle Of. The authenticity of this epistle cannot on any reasonable grounds be questioned. It is ranked by Eusebius Hist. Eccl., iii. 3, 23 among the Homologoumena, those books of Scripture which all acknowledged. The same historian tells us iii. 39; iv. 14 that it was quoted both by Polycarp and Papias; and in the existing epistle of Polycarp to the Philippians we find many passages chap, i., 1 Peter i. 8: ii., 1 Peter i. 21; iii. 9, c to justify the statement The First Epistle of Peter has always formed part of the Syriac Peshito, the most ancient version of the New Testament in existence. It is also clearly referred to in the second epistle ascribed to the same apostle 2 Peter iii. 1; and even those critics who deny tho authenticity of this latter epistle, admit that its evidence is conclusive in favour of tho first, inasmuch as its composition can by no hypothesis be placed later than the beginning of the second century. There does not seem, in fact, ever to have been any question raised in the Church respecting the genu.

Lieferung aus: Deutschland, Versandkostenfrei.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, The Book Depository [54837791], Slough, United Kingdom.
Language: English Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1875 Excerpt: .argument. The promise made to him Matt. xvi. 19 is afterwards repeated to all the apostles Matt, xviii. IS; John xx. 23, showing that he was simply addressed by Christ as the representative of all the rest, and that no peculiar influence or authority was meant to be conferred on him above his brethren. As was to be expected, not a few spurious works were in after times given to the world in the name of this celebrated apostle. The Gospel of Peter, The Acts of Peter, The Apocalypse of Peter, c, are specimens of these fabrications; but none of the writings bearing his name have the slightest claim to be esteemed genuine except the two canonical epistles. Peter, First Epistle Of. The authenticity of this epistle cannot on any reasonable grounds be questioned. It is ranked by Eusebius Hist. Eccl., iii. 3, 23 among the Homologoumena, those books of Scripture which all acknowledged. The same historian tells us iii. 39; iv. 14 that it was quoted both by Polycarp and Papias; and in the existing epistle of Polycarp to the Philippians we find many passages chap, i., 1 Peter i. 8: ii., 1 Peter i. 21; iii. 9, c to justify the statement The First Epistle of Peter has always formed part of the Syriac Peshito, the most ancient version of the New Testament in existence. It is also clearly referred to in the second epistle ascribed to the same apostle 2 Peter iii. 1; and even those critics who deny tho authenticity of this latter epistle, admit that its evidence is conclusive in favour of tho first, inasmuch as its composition can by no hypothesis be placed later than the beginning of the second century. There does not seem, in fact, ever to have been any question raised in the Church respecting the genu.