Von dem Buch The Politics of Apoliticism haben wir 11 gleiche oder sehr ähnliche Ausgaben identifiziert!
Falls Sie nur an einem bestimmten Exempar interessiert sind, können Sie aus der folgenden Liste jenes wählen, an dem Sie interessiert sind:
100%: The Politics of Apoliticism (ISBN: 9783110610161) 1942, de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, Deutschland, in Englisch, auch als eBook.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
43%: Colombo, Agustin (EDT); Mcgushin, Edward F. (EDT); Pfeifer, Geoffrey (EDT): Politics of Desire : Foucault, Deleuze, and Psychoanalysis (ISBN: 9781538144244) 2022, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Apr 2022, in Englisch, Broschiert.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
42%: Politics of Oil (ISBN: 9781315728292) Taylor & Francis, in Englisch.
Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
41%: The Politics Of Chile (ISBN: 9780429313820) Taylor & Francis, in Englisch.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
40%: Jan Woudstra (editor), Camilla Allen (editor): The Politics of Street Trees (ISBN: 9780367516291) 2022, Erstausgabe, in Englisch, Broschiert.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
40%: The Politics of Jesus (ISBN: 9781467420426) 1972, in Englisch, auch als eBook.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
39%: The Politics of Gen Z (ISBN: 9780231213899) Columbia University Press, in Deutsch, Taschenbuch.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
39%: Rethinking the Politics of Globalization (ISBN: 9781315195384) Taylor & Francis, in Englisch.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
38%: The Politics of Childhood (ISBN: 9780230523197) Palgrave Macmillan, Vereinigtes Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland, in Englisch, auch als eBook.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
38%: The Politics of Sexuality (ISBN: 9780585358109) in Englisch.
Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
The Politics of Apoliticism - 13 Angebote vergleichen
Bester Preis: € 82,58 (vom 01.07.2019)1
The Politics of Apoliticism (1942)
EN NW EB DLISBN: 9783110610161 bzw. 3110610167, in Englisch, de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, Deutschland, neu, E-Book, elektronischer Download.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Lagernd, zzgl. Versandkosten.
In 1942, the dictatorial regime of occupied France held a show trial that didn‘t work. In a society from which democratic checks and balances had been eliminated, under a regime that made its own laws to try its opponents, the government‘s signature legal initiative – a court packed with sympathetic magistrates and soldiers whose investigation of the defunct republic‘s leaders was supposed to demonstrate the superiority of the new regime – somehow not only failed to result in a conviction, but, in spite of the fact that only government-selected journalists were allowed to attend, turned into a podium for the regime‘s most bitter opponents. The public relations disaster was so great that the government was ultimately forced to cancel the trial. This catastrophic would-be show trial was not forced upon the regime by Germans unfamiliar with the state of domestic opinion; rather, it was a home-grown initiative whose results disgusted not only the French, but also the occupiers. This book offers a new explanation for the failure of the Riom Trial: that it was the result of ideas about the law that were deeply imbedded in the culture of the regime’s supporters. They genuinely believed that their opponents had been playing politics with the nation’s interests, whereas their own concerns were apolitical. The ultimate lesson of the Riom Trial is that the abnegation of politics can produce results almost as bad as a deliberate commitment to stamping out the beliefs of others. Today, politicians on both sides of the political spectrum denounce excessive polarization as the cause of political gridlock; but this may simply be what real democracy looks like when it seeks to express the wishes of a divided people.
In 1942, the dictatorial regime of occupied France held a show trial that didn‘t work. In a society from which democratic checks and balances had been eliminated, under a regime that made its own laws to try its opponents, the government‘s signature legal initiative – a court packed with sympathetic magistrates and soldiers whose investigation of the defunct republic‘s leaders was supposed to demonstrate the superiority of the new regime – somehow not only failed to result in a conviction, but, in spite of the fact that only government-selected journalists were allowed to attend, turned into a podium for the regime‘s most bitter opponents. The public relations disaster was so great that the government was ultimately forced to cancel the trial. This catastrophic would-be show trial was not forced upon the regime by Germans unfamiliar with the state of domestic opinion; rather, it was a home-grown initiative whose results disgusted not only the French, but also the occupiers. This book offers a new explanation for the failure of the Riom Trial: that it was the result of ideas about the law that were deeply imbedded in the culture of the regime’s supporters. They genuinely believed that their opponents had been playing politics with the nation’s interests, whereas their own concerns were apolitical. The ultimate lesson of the Riom Trial is that the abnegation of politics can produce results almost as bad as a deliberate commitment to stamping out the beliefs of others. Today, politicians on both sides of the political spectrum denounce excessive polarization as the cause of political gridlock; but this may simply be what real democracy looks like when it seeks to express the wishes of a divided people.
2
The Politics of Apoliticism (1942)
EN NW EB DLISBN: 9783110610161 bzw. 3110610167, in Englisch, de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, Deutschland, neu, E-Book, elektronischer Download.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Lagernd, zzgl. Versandkosten.
In 1942, the dictatorial regime of occupied France held a show trial that didn‘t work. In a society from which democratic checks and balances had been eliminated, under a regime that made its own laws to try its opponents, the government‘s signature legal initiative – a court packed with sympathetic magistrates and soldiers whose investigation of the defunct republic‘s leaders was supposed to demonstrate the superiority of the new regime – somehow not only failed to result in a conviction, but, in spite of the fact that only government-selected journalists were allowed to attend, turned into a podium for the regime‘s most bitter opponents. The public relations disaster was so great that the government was ultimately forced to cancel the trial. This catastrophic would-be show trial was not forced upon the regime by Germans unfamiliar with the state of domestic opinion; rather, it was a home-grown initiative whose results disgusted not only the French, but also the occupiers. This book offers a new explanation for the failure of the Riom Trial: that it was the result of ideas about the law that were deeply imbedded in the culture of the regime's supporters. They genuinely believed that their opponents had been playing politics with the nation's interests, whereas their own concerns were apolitical. The ultimate lesson of the Riom Trial is that the abnegation of politics can produce results almost as bad as a deliberate commitment to stamping out the beliefs of others. Today, politicians on both sides of the political spectrum denounce excessive polarization as the cause of political gridlock; but this may simply be what real democracy looks like when it seeks to express the wishes of a divided people.
In 1942, the dictatorial regime of occupied France held a show trial that didn‘t work. In a society from which democratic checks and balances had been eliminated, under a regime that made its own laws to try its opponents, the government‘s signature legal initiative – a court packed with sympathetic magistrates and soldiers whose investigation of the defunct republic‘s leaders was supposed to demonstrate the superiority of the new regime – somehow not only failed to result in a conviction, but, in spite of the fact that only government-selected journalists were allowed to attend, turned into a podium for the regime‘s most bitter opponents. The public relations disaster was so great that the government was ultimately forced to cancel the trial. This catastrophic would-be show trial was not forced upon the regime by Germans unfamiliar with the state of domestic opinion; rather, it was a home-grown initiative whose results disgusted not only the French, but also the occupiers. This book offers a new explanation for the failure of the Riom Trial: that it was the result of ideas about the law that were deeply imbedded in the culture of the regime's supporters. They genuinely believed that their opponents had been playing politics with the nation's interests, whereas their own concerns were apolitical. The ultimate lesson of the Riom Trial is that the abnegation of politics can produce results almost as bad as a deliberate commitment to stamping out the beliefs of others. Today, politicians on both sides of the political spectrum denounce excessive polarization as the cause of political gridlock; but this may simply be what real democracy looks like when it seeks to express the wishes of a divided people.
3
The Politics of Desire : Foucault, Deleuze, and Psychoanalysis (2022)
~EN HC NWISBN: 9781538144244 bzw. 1538144247, vermutlich in Englisch, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Apr 2022, gebundenes Buch, neu.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, AHA-BUCH GmbH [51283250], Einbeck, Germany.
nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware -In his preface to Deleuze and Guattari's Anti-Oedipus, Michel Foucault notes that in the late sixties, there is a turn away from Freud and a movement toward what he calls an 'experience and technology of desire that is no longer Freudian'. Foucault, Deleuze, and Guattari were interested in, and engaged with this shift and their collective work in these areas spawned a larger post-Freudian literature. This book gathers contributions from international scholars with the aim of exploring the social, political, and philosophical dimension of Deleuze and Guattari's, and Foucault's critical encounters with psychoanalytic thought: Their possible connections, their divergences, the fields of reflection that these encounters open, and the problems and debates that led Foucault and Deleuze and Guattari to engage with psychoanalysis in the ways that they did. In doing so, the main goal of the book is not to engage in a critique of the discipline of Psychoanalysis as such, but to investigate how Foucault's and Deleuze's critique of Psychoanalysis gives rise to a political reflection that draws on some of Psychoanalysis key notions. Among these, the concept of Desire is central as it allows us to grasp the different ways in which Foucault and Deleuze politically engage with Psychoanalysis: for Deleuze, Desire is the element through which Revolution becomes possible, whereas for Foucault Desire is a cornerstone of the modern mechanisms of subjection. Drawing both on new material like Confessions of the Flesh, the 4th volume of Foucault's History of Sexuality and on Foucault and Deleuze main work, the book covers a variety of topics including the contrast between Foucault's and Deleuze political understanding of desire and pleasure; the genealogy of desire as a way to investigate the historical shaping of psychoanalysis; the relationship between psychoanalysis and the normalizing mechanisms of power (e.g. biopolitics and disciplinary regimes); the ways in which psychoanalysis and neoliberalism come together in particular moments, the status and role of desire in revolt, resistance, and transformation; Foucault and Deleuze's different approaches to the unconscious; the role of desire in the formation of identity; etc., In the 50th anniversary of Deleuze and Guattari's Anti-Oedipus, one of the major references that inspires the many chapters in this book, we aim to pay homage to these two important figures of contemporary thought by enriching and opening new lines of thought and problematization of the political reflection on Desire that Foucault and Deleuze developed. 206 pp. Englisch, Books.
nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware -In his preface to Deleuze and Guattari's Anti-Oedipus, Michel Foucault notes that in the late sixties, there is a turn away from Freud and a movement toward what he calls an 'experience and technology of desire that is no longer Freudian'. Foucault, Deleuze, and Guattari were interested in, and engaged with this shift and their collective work in these areas spawned a larger post-Freudian literature. This book gathers contributions from international scholars with the aim of exploring the social, political, and philosophical dimension of Deleuze and Guattari's, and Foucault's critical encounters with psychoanalytic thought: Their possible connections, their divergences, the fields of reflection that these encounters open, and the problems and debates that led Foucault and Deleuze and Guattari to engage with psychoanalysis in the ways that they did. In doing so, the main goal of the book is not to engage in a critique of the discipline of Psychoanalysis as such, but to investigate how Foucault's and Deleuze's critique of Psychoanalysis gives rise to a political reflection that draws on some of Psychoanalysis key notions. Among these, the concept of Desire is central as it allows us to grasp the different ways in which Foucault and Deleuze politically engage with Psychoanalysis: for Deleuze, Desire is the element through which Revolution becomes possible, whereas for Foucault Desire is a cornerstone of the modern mechanisms of subjection. Drawing both on new material like Confessions of the Flesh, the 4th volume of Foucault's History of Sexuality and on Foucault and Deleuze main work, the book covers a variety of topics including the contrast between Foucault's and Deleuze political understanding of desire and pleasure; the genealogy of desire as a way to investigate the historical shaping of psychoanalysis; the relationship between psychoanalysis and the normalizing mechanisms of power (e.g. biopolitics and disciplinary regimes); the ways in which psychoanalysis and neoliberalism come together in particular moments, the status and role of desire in revolt, resistance, and transformation; Foucault and Deleuze's different approaches to the unconscious; the role of desire in the formation of identity; etc., In the 50th anniversary of Deleuze and Guattari's Anti-Oedipus, one of the major references that inspires the many chapters in this book, we aim to pay homage to these two important figures of contemporary thought by enriching and opening new lines of thought and problematization of the political reflection on Desire that Foucault and Deleuze developed. 206 pp. Englisch, Books.
4
The Politics of Desire (2022)
EN HC NWISBN: 9781538144244 bzw. 1538144247, in Englisch, gebundenes Buch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Niederlande, plus shipping.
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen
5
Politics of Desire : Foucault, Deleuze, and Psychoanalysis (2022)
~EN HC USISBN: 9781538144244 bzw. 1538144247, vermutlich in Englisch, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, gebundenes Buch, gebraucht, guter Zustand.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, GreatBookPricesUK [72536976], Castle Donington, DERBY, United Kingdom.
Unread book in perfect condition. Books.
Unread book in perfect condition. Books.
10
POLITICS OF DESIREFOUCAULT DECB (2022)
~EN HC NW RPISBN: 9781538144244 bzw. 1538144247, vermutlich in Englisch, ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD, gebundenes Buch, neu, Nachdruck.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, moluna [73551232], Greven, Germany.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Books.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Books.
Lade…