Power Politics and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the Ilkhanate of Iran
7 Angebote vergleichen
Preise | 2016 | 2017 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
Schnitt | € 77,88 | € 54,67 | € 72,49 |
Nachfrage |
Power, Politics, and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the =Ilkhanate of Iran (2016)
ISBN: 9780191081088 bzw. 0191081086, in Englisch, OUP Oxford, OUP Oxford, OUP Oxford, neu, E-Book, elektronischer Download.
This study provides a new interpretation of how political authority was conceived and transmitted in the Early Mongol Empire (1227-1259) and its successor state in the Middle East, the Ikhanate (1258-1335). Authority within the Mongol Empire was intimately tied to the character of its founder, Chinggis Khan, whose reign served as an idealized model for the exercise of legitimate authority amongst his political successors. Yet Chinggis Khan's legacy was interpreted differently by the various factions within his army. In the years after his death, two distinct political traditions emerged within the Mongol Empire, the collegial and the patrimonialist. Each of these streams represented the economic and political interests of different groups within the Mongol Empire, respectively, the military aristocracy and the central government. The supporters of both streams claimed to adhere to the ideal of Chinggisid rule, but their different statuses within the Mongol community led them to hold divergent views of what constituted legitimate political authority. Michael Hope's study details the origin of, and the differences between, these two streams of tradition; analyzing the role that these streams played in the political development of the Mongol Empire and the? lkh?nate; and assessing the role that ideological tension between the two streams played in the events leading up to the division of the Ilkhanate. Hope demonstrates that the policy and identity of both the Early Mongol Empire and the Ilkhanate were defined by the conflict between these competing streams of Chinggisid authority.
Power, Politics, and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the =Ilkhānate of Iran (2016)
ISBN: 9780191081088 bzw. 0191081086, in Englisch, Oup Oxford, neu, E-Book.
bol.com.
This study provides a new interpretation of how political authority was conceived and transmitted in the Early Mongol Empire (1227-1259) and its successor state in the Middle East, the Ikhanate (1258-1335). Authority within the Mongol Empire was intimately tied to the character of its founder, Chinggis Khan, whose reign served as an idealized model for the exercise of legitimate authority amongst his political successors. Yet Chinggis Khan's legacy was interpreted differently by the various fact... This study provides a new interpretation of how political authority was conceived and transmitted in the Early Mongol Empire (1227-1259) and its successor state in the Middle East, the Ikhanate (1258-1335). Authority within the Mongol Empire was intimately tied to the character of its founder, Chinggis Khan, whose reign served as an idealized model for the exercise of legitimate authority amongst his political successors. Yet Chinggis Khan's legacy was interpreted differently by the various factions within his army. In the years after his death, two distinct political traditions emerged within the Mongol Empire, the collegial and the patrimonialist. Each of these streams represented the economic and political interests of different groups within the Mongol Empire, respectively, the military aristocracy and the central government. The supporters of both streams claimed to adhere to the ideal of Chinggisid rule, but their different statuses within the Mongol community led them to hold divergent views of what constituted legitimate political authority. Michael Hope's study details the origin of, and the differences between, these two streams of tradition; analyzing the role that these streams played in the political development of the Mongol Empire and the "lkh?nate; and assessing the role that ideological tension between the two streams played in the events leading up to the division of the Ilkhanate. Hope demonstrates that the policy and identity of both the Early Mongol Empire and the Ilkhanate were defined by the conflict between these competing streams of Chinggisid authority.Taal: Engels;Formaat: ePub met kopieerbeveiliging (DRM) van Adobe;Kopieerrechten: Het kopiëren van (delen van) de pagina's is niet toegestaan ;Geschikt voor: Alle e-readers geschikt voor ebooks in ePub formaat. Tablet of smartphone voorzien van een app zoals de bol.com Kobo app.;Verschijningsdatum: september 2016;ISBN10: 0191081086;ISBN13: 9780191081088; Engelstalig | Ebook | 2016.
Power, Politics, and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the =Ilkhānate of Iran (2016)
ISBN: 9780191081088 bzw. 0191081086, in Englisch, 360 Seiten, OUP Oxford, neu, E-Book, elektronischer Download.
This study provides a new interpretation of how political authority was conceived and transmitted in the Early Mongol Empire (1227-1259) and its successor state in the Middle East, the Ikhanate (1258-1335). Authority within the Mongol Empire was intimately tied to the character of its founder, Chinggis Khan, whose reign served as an idealized model for the exercise of legitimate authority amongst his political successors. Yet Chinggis Khan's legacy was interpreted differently by the various factions within his army. In the years after his death, two distinct political traditions emerged within the Mongol Empire, the collegial and the patrimonialist. Each of these streams represented the economic and political interests of different groups within the Mongol Empire, respectively, the military aristocracy and the central government. The supporters of both streams claimed to adhere to the ideal of Chinggisid rule, but their different statuses within the Mongol community led them to hold divergent views of what constituted legitimate political authority. Michael Hope's study details the origin of, and the differences between, these two streams of tradition; analyzing the role that these streams played in the political development of the Mongol Empire and the "lkh?nate; and assessing the role that ideological tension between the two streams played in the events leading up to the division of the Ilkhanate. Hope demonstrates that the policy and identity of both the Early Mongol Empire and the Ilkhanate were defined by the conflict between these competing streams of Chinggisid authority. Kindle Edition, Format: Kindle eBook, Label: OUP Oxford, OUP Oxford, Product group: eBooks, Published: 2016-09-29, Release date: 2016-09-29, Studio: OUP Oxford.
Power, Politics, and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the =Ilkh
ISBN: 9780191081088 bzw. 0191081086, in Englisch, OUP Oxford, neu, E-Book.
Power-Politics-and-Tradition-in-the-Mongol-Empire-and-the-Ilkh~~Michael-Hope, Power, Politics, and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the =Ilkh, NOOK Book (eBook).
Power Politics and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the Ilkhanate of Iran
ISBN: 9780191081088 bzw. 0191081086, vermutlich in Englisch, Power Politics and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the Ilkhanate of Iran - eBook als epub von Michael Hope - Oxford University Press - 97801910... neu, E-Book, elektronischer Download.
Power Politics and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the Ilkhanate of Iran
ISBN: 9780191081088 bzw. 0191081086, vermutlich in Englisch, Oxford University Press, Vereinigtes Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland, neu, E-Book, elektronischer Download.
Power, Politics, and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the =Ilkhanate of Iran als eBook Download von
ISBN: 9780191081088 bzw. 0191081086, in Englisch, Oxford University Press, neu, E-Book.