Von dem Buch Agency and Integrality: Philosophical Themes in the Ancient Discussions of Determinism and Responsibility: Volume 32 (Philosophical Studies Series) haben wir 3 gleiche oder sehr ähnliche Ausgaben identifiziert!
Falls Sie nur an einem bestimmten Exempar interessiert sind, können Sie aus der folgenden Liste jenes wählen, an dem Sie interessiert sind:
100%: Michael J. White: Agency and Integrality: Philosophical Themes in the Ancient Discussions of Determinism and Responsibility: Volume 32 (Philosophical Studies Series) (ISBN: 9789401088572) Springer, in Englisch, Band: 32, Taschenbuch.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
96%: Michael J. White, M. J. White: Agency and Integrality: Philosophical Themes in the Ancient Discussions of Determinism and Responsibility (Philosophical Studies Series) (ISBN: 9789027719683) 1985, 1985. Ausgabe, in Englisch, Broschiert.
Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
92%: Michael J. White, M. J. White: Agency and Integrality, Philosophical Themes in the Ancient Discussions of Determinism and Responsibility (ISBN: 9789400953390) 2015, Springer, in Holländisch, auch als eBook.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
Agency and Integrality: Philosophical Themes in the Ancient Discussions of Determinism and Responsibility: Volume 32 (Philosophical Studies Series)
9 Angebote vergleichen
Bester Preis: € 74,43 (vom 08.03.2017)1
Agency and Integrality: Philosophical Themes in the Ancient Discussions of Determinism and Responsibility
EN HC NWISBN: 9789027719683 bzw. 9027719683, in Englisch, Springer Netherlands Springer, Berlin, gebundenes Buch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Deutschland, Ingyenes szállítás.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG, [1].
It is not very surprising that it was no less true in antiquity than it is today that adult human beings are held to be responsible for most of their actions. Indeed, virtually all cultures in all historical periods seem to have had some conception of human agency which, in the absence of certain responsibility-defeating conditions, entails such responsibility. Few philosophers have had the temerity to maintain that this entailment is trivial because such responsibility-defeating conditions are always present. Another not very surprising fact is that ancient thinkers tended to ascribe integrality to "what is" (to on). That is, they typically regarded "what is" as a cosmos or whole with distinguishable parts that fit together in some coherent or cohesive manner, rather than either as a "unity" with no parts or as a collection containing members (ta onta or "things that are") standing in no "natural" relations to one another. 1 The philoso phical problem of determinism and responsibility may, I think, best be characterized as follows: it is the problem of preserving the phenomenon of human agency (which would seem to require a certain separateness of individual human beings from the rest of the cosmos) when one sets about the philosophical or scientific task of explaining the integrality of "what is" by means of the development of a theory of causation or explanation ( concepts that came to be lumped together by the Greeks under the term "aitia") . 296 S. Versandfertig in 2-4 Wochen, Hardcover, Neuware, offene Rechnung (Vorkasse vorbehalten).
Von Händler/Antiquariat, buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG, [1].
It is not very surprising that it was no less true in antiquity than it is today that adult human beings are held to be responsible for most of their actions. Indeed, virtually all cultures in all historical periods seem to have had some conception of human agency which, in the absence of certain responsibility-defeating conditions, entails such responsibility. Few philosophers have had the temerity to maintain that this entailment is trivial because such responsibility-defeating conditions are always present. Another not very surprising fact is that ancient thinkers tended to ascribe integrality to "what is" (to on). That is, they typically regarded "what is" as a cosmos or whole with distinguishable parts that fit together in some coherent or cohesive manner, rather than either as a "unity" with no parts or as a collection containing members (ta onta or "things that are") standing in no "natural" relations to one another. 1 The philoso phical problem of determinism and responsibility may, I think, best be characterized as follows: it is the problem of preserving the phenomenon of human agency (which would seem to require a certain separateness of individual human beings from the rest of the cosmos) when one sets about the philosophical or scientific task of explaining the integrality of "what is" by means of the development of a theory of causation or explanation ( concepts that came to be lumped together by the Greeks under the term "aitia") . 296 S. Versandfertig in 2-4 Wochen, Hardcover, Neuware, offene Rechnung (Vorkasse vorbehalten).
2
Agency and Integrality: Philosophical Themes in the Ancient Discussions of Determinism and Responsibility: Volume 32 (Philosophical Studies Series) (2013)
EN PB USISBN: 9789401088572 bzw. 9401088578, Band: 32, in Englisch, 304 Seiten, Springer, Taschenbuch, gebraucht.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigtes Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland, Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days, exclusief verzendkosten (indien geleverd).
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Herb Tandree Philosophy Books.
It is not very surprising that it was no less true in antiquity than it is today that adult human beings are held to be responsible for most of their actions. Indeed, virtually all cultures in all historical periods seem to have had some conception of human agency which, in the absence of certain responsibility-defeating conditions, entails such responsibility. Few philosophers have had the temerity to maintain that this entailment is trivial because such responsibility-defeating conditions are always present. Another not very surprising fact is that ancient thinkers tended to ascribe integrality to "what is" (to on). That is, they typically regarded "what is" as a cosmos or whole with distinguishable parts that fit together in some coherent or cohesive manner, rather than either as a "unity" with no parts or as a collection containing members (ta onta or "things that are") standing in no "natural" relations to one another. 1 The philoso- phical problem of determinism and responsibility may, I think, best be characterized as follows: it is the problem of preserving the phenomenon of human agency (which would seem to require a certain separateness of individual human beings from the rest of the cosmos) when one sets about the philosophical or scientific task of explaining the integrality of "what is" by means of the development of a theory of causation or explanation ( concepts that came to be lumped together by the Greeks under the term "aitia") . Paperback, Editie: Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 1985, Label: Springer, Springer, Productgroep: Book, Gepubliceerd: 2013-10-04, Releasedatum: 2013-10-04, Studio: Springer, Verkoop rang: 1338963.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Herb Tandree Philosophy Books.
It is not very surprising that it was no less true in antiquity than it is today that adult human beings are held to be responsible for most of their actions. Indeed, virtually all cultures in all historical periods seem to have had some conception of human agency which, in the absence of certain responsibility-defeating conditions, entails such responsibility. Few philosophers have had the temerity to maintain that this entailment is trivial because such responsibility-defeating conditions are always present. Another not very surprising fact is that ancient thinkers tended to ascribe integrality to "what is" (to on). That is, they typically regarded "what is" as a cosmos or whole with distinguishable parts that fit together in some coherent or cohesive manner, rather than either as a "unity" with no parts or as a collection containing members (ta onta or "things that are") standing in no "natural" relations to one another. 1 The philoso- phical problem of determinism and responsibility may, I think, best be characterized as follows: it is the problem of preserving the phenomenon of human agency (which would seem to require a certain separateness of individual human beings from the rest of the cosmos) when one sets about the philosophical or scientific task of explaining the integrality of "what is" by means of the development of a theory of causation or explanation ( concepts that came to be lumped together by the Greeks under the term "aitia") . Paperback, Editie: Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 1985, Label: Springer, Springer, Productgroep: Book, Gepubliceerd: 2013-10-04, Releasedatum: 2013-10-04, Studio: Springer, Verkoop rang: 1338963.
3
Agency and Integrality: Philosophical Themes in the Ancient Discussions of Determinism and Responsibility: Volume 32 (Philosophical Studies Series) (2013)
EN PB NWISBN: 9789401088572 bzw. 9401088578, Band: 32, in Englisch, 304 Seiten, Springer, Taschenbuch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigtes Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland, Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days, exclusief verzendkosten (indien geleverd).
Von Händler/Antiquariat, UKPaperbackshop.
It is not very surprising that it was no less true in antiquity than it is today that adult human beings are held to be responsible for most of their actions. Indeed, virtually all cultures in all historical periods seem to have had some conception of human agency which, in the absence of certain responsibility-defeating conditions, entails such responsibility. Few philosophers have had the temerity to maintain that this entailment is trivial because such responsibility-defeating conditions are always present. Another not very surprising fact is that ancient thinkers tended to ascribe integrality to "what is" (to on). That is, they typically regarded "what is" as a cosmos or whole with distinguishable parts that fit together in some coherent or cohesive manner, rather than either as a "unity" with no parts or as a collection containing members (ta onta or "things that are") standing in no "natural" relations to one another. 1 The philoso- phical problem of determinism and responsibility may, I think, best be characterized as follows: it is the problem of preserving the phenomenon of human agency (which would seem to require a certain separateness of individual human beings from the rest of the cosmos) when one sets about the philosophical or scientific task of explaining the integrality of "what is" by means of the development of a theory of causation or explanation ( concepts that came to be lumped together by the Greeks under the term "aitia") . Paperback, Editie: Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 1985, Label: Springer, Springer, Productgroep: Book, Gepubliceerd: 2013-10-04, Releasedatum: 2013-10-04, Studio: Springer, Verkoop rang: 1338963.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, UKPaperbackshop.
It is not very surprising that it was no less true in antiquity than it is today that adult human beings are held to be responsible for most of their actions. Indeed, virtually all cultures in all historical periods seem to have had some conception of human agency which, in the absence of certain responsibility-defeating conditions, entails such responsibility. Few philosophers have had the temerity to maintain that this entailment is trivial because such responsibility-defeating conditions are always present. Another not very surprising fact is that ancient thinkers tended to ascribe integrality to "what is" (to on). That is, they typically regarded "what is" as a cosmos or whole with distinguishable parts that fit together in some coherent or cohesive manner, rather than either as a "unity" with no parts or as a collection containing members (ta onta or "things that are") standing in no "natural" relations to one another. 1 The philoso- phical problem of determinism and responsibility may, I think, best be characterized as follows: it is the problem of preserving the phenomenon of human agency (which would seem to require a certain separateness of individual human beings from the rest of the cosmos) when one sets about the philosophical or scientific task of explaining the integrality of "what is" by means of the development of a theory of causation or explanation ( concepts that came to be lumped together by the Greeks under the term "aitia") . Paperback, Editie: Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 1985, Label: Springer, Springer, Productgroep: Book, Gepubliceerd: 2013-10-04, Releasedatum: 2013-10-04, Studio: Springer, Verkoop rang: 1338963.
4
Agency and Integrality, Philosophical Themes in the Ancient Discussions of Determinism and Responsibility (1985)
NL HC NWISBN: 9789027719683 bzw. 9027719683, in Holländisch, Springer, gebundenes Buch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Niederlande, Vermoedelijk 4-6 weken.
bol.com.
It is not very surprising that it was no less true in antiquity than it is today that adult human beings are held to be responsible for most of their actions. Indeed, virtually all cultures in all historical periods seem to have had some conception of human agency which, in the absence of certain responsibility-defeating conditions, entails such responsibility. Few philosophers have had the temerity to maintain that this entailment is trivial because such responsibility-defeating conditions are ... It is not very surprising that it was no less true in antiquity than it is today that adult human beings are held to be responsible for most of their actions. Indeed, virtually all cultures in all historical periods seem to have had some conception of human agency which, in the absence of certain responsibility-defeating conditions, entails such responsibility. Few philosophers have had the temerity to maintain that this entailment is trivial because such responsibility-defeating conditions are always present. Another not very surprising fact is that ancient thinkers tended to ascribe integrality to "what is" (to on). That is, they typically regarded "what is" as a cosmos or whole with distinguishable parts that fit together in some coherent or cohesive manner, rather than either as a "unity" with no parts or as a collection containing members (ta onta or "things that are") standing in no "natural" relations to one another. 1 The philoso phical problem of determinism and responsibility may, I think, best be characterized as follows: it is the problem of preserving the phenomenon of human agency (which would seem to require a certain separateness of individual human beings from the rest of the cosmos) when one sets about the philosophical or scientific task of explaining the integrality of "what is" by means of the development of a theory of causation or explanation ( concepts that came to be lumped together by the Greeks under the term "aitia") .Taal: Engels;Afmetingen: 0x230x150 mm;Gewicht: 620,00 gram;Verschijningsdatum: december 1985;Druk: 1;ISBN10: 9027719683;ISBN13: 9789027719683; Engelstalig | Hardcover | 1985.
bol.com.
It is not very surprising that it was no less true in antiquity than it is today that adult human beings are held to be responsible for most of their actions. Indeed, virtually all cultures in all historical periods seem to have had some conception of human agency which, in the absence of certain responsibility-defeating conditions, entails such responsibility. Few philosophers have had the temerity to maintain that this entailment is trivial because such responsibility-defeating conditions are ... It is not very surprising that it was no less true in antiquity than it is today that adult human beings are held to be responsible for most of their actions. Indeed, virtually all cultures in all historical periods seem to have had some conception of human agency which, in the absence of certain responsibility-defeating conditions, entails such responsibility. Few philosophers have had the temerity to maintain that this entailment is trivial because such responsibility-defeating conditions are always present. Another not very surprising fact is that ancient thinkers tended to ascribe integrality to "what is" (to on). That is, they typically regarded "what is" as a cosmos or whole with distinguishable parts that fit together in some coherent or cohesive manner, rather than either as a "unity" with no parts or as a collection containing members (ta onta or "things that are") standing in no "natural" relations to one another. 1 The philoso phical problem of determinism and responsibility may, I think, best be characterized as follows: it is the problem of preserving the phenomenon of human agency (which would seem to require a certain separateness of individual human beings from the rest of the cosmos) when one sets about the philosophical or scientific task of explaining the integrality of "what is" by means of the development of a theory of causation or explanation ( concepts that came to be lumped together by the Greeks under the term "aitia") .Taal: Engels;Afmetingen: 0x230x150 mm;Gewicht: 620,00 gram;Verschijningsdatum: december 1985;Druk: 1;ISBN10: 9027719683;ISBN13: 9789027719683; Engelstalig | Hardcover | 1985.
5
Agency and Integrality, Philosophical Themes in the Ancient Discussions of Determinism and Responsibility (2011)
NL PB NWISBN: 9789401088572 bzw. 9401088578, in Holländisch, Springer, Taschenbuch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Niederlande, Vermoedelijk 4-6 weken.
bol.com.
It is not very surprising that it was no less true in antiquity than it is today that adult human beings are held to be responsible for most of their actions. Indeed, virtually all cultures in all historical periods seem to have had some conception of human agency which, in the absence of certain responsibility-defeating conditions, entails such responsibility. Few philosophers have had the temerity to maintain that this entailment is trivial because such responsibility-defeating conditions are ... It is not very surprising that it was no less true in antiquity than it is today that adult human beings are held to be responsible for most of their actions. Indeed, virtually all cultures in all historical periods seem to have had some conception of human agency which, in the absence of certain responsibility-defeating conditions, entails such responsibility. Few philosophers have had the temerity to maintain that this entailment is trivial because such responsibility-defeating conditions are always present. Another not very surprising fact is that ancient thinkers tended to ascribe integrality to what is (to on). That is, they typically regarded what is as a cosmos or whole with distinguishable parts that fit together in some coherent or cohesive manner, rather than either as a unity with no parts or as a collection containing members (ta onta or things that are ) standing in no natural relations to one another. 1 The philoso- phical problem of determinism and responsibility may, I think, best be characterized as follows: it is the problem of preserving the phenomenon of human agency (which would seem to require a certain separateness of individual human beings from the rest of the cosmos) when one sets about the philosophical or scientific task of explaining the integrality of what is by means of the development of a theory of causation or explanation ( concepts that came to be lumped together by the Greeks under the term aitia ) .Soort: Met illustraties;Taal: Engels;Afmetingen: 16x229x152 mm;Gewicht: 447,00 gram;Verschijningsdatum: december 2011;ISBN10: 9401088578;ISBN13: 9789401088572; Engelstalig | Paperback | 2011.
bol.com.
It is not very surprising that it was no less true in antiquity than it is today that adult human beings are held to be responsible for most of their actions. Indeed, virtually all cultures in all historical periods seem to have had some conception of human agency which, in the absence of certain responsibility-defeating conditions, entails such responsibility. Few philosophers have had the temerity to maintain that this entailment is trivial because such responsibility-defeating conditions are ... It is not very surprising that it was no less true in antiquity than it is today that adult human beings are held to be responsible for most of their actions. Indeed, virtually all cultures in all historical periods seem to have had some conception of human agency which, in the absence of certain responsibility-defeating conditions, entails such responsibility. Few philosophers have had the temerity to maintain that this entailment is trivial because such responsibility-defeating conditions are always present. Another not very surprising fact is that ancient thinkers tended to ascribe integrality to what is (to on). That is, they typically regarded what is as a cosmos or whole with distinguishable parts that fit together in some coherent or cohesive manner, rather than either as a unity with no parts or as a collection containing members (ta onta or things that are ) standing in no natural relations to one another. 1 The philoso- phical problem of determinism and responsibility may, I think, best be characterized as follows: it is the problem of preserving the phenomenon of human agency (which would seem to require a certain separateness of individual human beings from the rest of the cosmos) when one sets about the philosophical or scientific task of explaining the integrality of what is by means of the development of a theory of causation or explanation ( concepts that came to be lumped together by the Greeks under the term aitia ) .Soort: Met illustraties;Taal: Engels;Afmetingen: 16x229x152 mm;Gewicht: 447,00 gram;Verschijningsdatum: december 2011;ISBN10: 9401088578;ISBN13: 9789401088572; Engelstalig | Paperback | 2011.
6
Agency and Integrality: Philosophical Themes in the Ancient Discussions of Determinism and Responsibility (Philosophical Studies Series) (1985)
EN HC USISBN: 9789027719683 bzw. 9027719683, in Englisch, 296 Seiten, 1985. Ausgabe, Springer, gebundenes Buch, gebraucht.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Usually ships in 1-2 business days.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, owl_of_minerva_books.
It is not very surprising that it was no less true in antiquity than it is today that adult human beings are held to be responsible for most of their actions. Indeed, virtually all cultures in all historical periods seem to have had some conception of human agency which, in the absence of certain responsibility-defeating conditions, entails such responsibility. Few philosophers have had the temerity to maintain that this entailment is trivial because such responsibility-defeating conditions are always present. Another not very surprising fact is that ancient thinkers tended to ascribe integrality to "what is" (to on). That is, they typically regarded "what is" as a cosmos or whole with distinguishable parts that fit together in some coherent or cohesive manner, rather than either as a "unity" with no parts or as a collection containing members (ta onta or "things that are") standing in no "natural" relations to one another. 1 The philoso phical problem of determinism and responsibility may, I think, best be characterized as follows: it is the problem of preserving the phenomenon of human agency (which would seem to require a certain separateness of individual human beings from the rest of the cosmos) when one sets about the philosophical or scientific task of explaining the integrality of "what is" by means of the development of a theory of causation or explanation ( concepts that came to be lumped together by the Greeks under the term "aitia") . Hardcover, Kiadás: 1985, Címke: Springer, Springer, Termékcsoport: Book, Megjelent: 1985-09-30, Stúdió: Springer, Értékesítési rangsorban: 12253724.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, owl_of_minerva_books.
It is not very surprising that it was no less true in antiquity than it is today that adult human beings are held to be responsible for most of their actions. Indeed, virtually all cultures in all historical periods seem to have had some conception of human agency which, in the absence of certain responsibility-defeating conditions, entails such responsibility. Few philosophers have had the temerity to maintain that this entailment is trivial because such responsibility-defeating conditions are always present. Another not very surprising fact is that ancient thinkers tended to ascribe integrality to "what is" (to on). That is, they typically regarded "what is" as a cosmos or whole with distinguishable parts that fit together in some coherent or cohesive manner, rather than either as a "unity" with no parts or as a collection containing members (ta onta or "things that are") standing in no "natural" relations to one another. 1 The philoso phical problem of determinism and responsibility may, I think, best be characterized as follows: it is the problem of preserving the phenomenon of human agency (which would seem to require a certain separateness of individual human beings from the rest of the cosmos) when one sets about the philosophical or scientific task of explaining the integrality of "what is" by means of the development of a theory of causation or explanation ( concepts that came to be lumped together by the Greeks under the term "aitia") . Hardcover, Kiadás: 1985, Címke: Springer, Springer, Termékcsoport: Book, Megjelent: 1985-09-30, Stúdió: Springer, Értékesítési rangsorban: 12253724.
7
Agency and Integrality, Philosophical Themes in the Ancient Discussions of Determinism and Responsibility (2015)
NL NW EBISBN: 9789400953390 bzw. 9400953399, in Holländisch, Springer, neu, E-Book.
Lieferung aus: Niederlande, Direct beschikbaar.
bol.com.
It is not very surprising that it was no less true in antiquity than it is today that adult human beings are held to be responsible for most of their actions. Indeed, virtually all cultures in all historical periods seem to have had some conception of human agency which, in the absence of certain responsibility-defeating conditions, entails such responsibility. Few philosophers have had the temerity to maintain that this entailment is trivial because such responsibility-defeating conditions are ... It is not very surprising that it was no less true in antiquity than it is today that adult human beings are held to be responsible for most of their actions. Indeed, virtually all cultures in all historical periods seem to have had some conception of human agency which, in the absence of certain responsibility-defeating conditions, entails such responsibility. Few philosophers have had the temerity to maintain that this entailment is trivial because such responsibility-defeating conditions are always present. Another not very surprising fact is that ancient thinkers tended to ascribe integrality to what is (to on). That is, they typically regarded what is as a cosmos or whole with distinguishable parts that fit together in some coherent or cohesive manner, rather than either as a unity with no parts or as a collection containing members (ta onta or things that are ) standing in no natural relations to one another. 1 The philoso- phical problem of determinism and responsibility may, I think, best be characterized as follows: it is the problem of preserving the phenomenon of human agency (which would seem to require a certain separateness of individual human beings from the rest of the cosmos) when one sets about the philosophical or scientific task of explaining the integrality of what is by means of the development of a theory of causation or explanation ( concepts that came to be lumped together by the Greeks under the term aitia ) .Taal: Engels;Formaat: ePub met kopieerbeveiliging (DRM) van Adobe;Kopieerrechten: Het kopiëren van (delen van) de pagina's is niet toegestaan ;Geschikt voor: Alle e-readers te koop bij bol.com (of compatible met Adobe DRM). Telefoons/tablets met Google Android (1.6 of hoger) voorzien van bol.com boekenbol app. PC en Mac met Adobe reader software;Verschijningsdatum: september 2015;ISBN10: 9400953399;ISBN13: 9789400953390; Engelstalig | Ebook | 2015.
bol.com.
It is not very surprising that it was no less true in antiquity than it is today that adult human beings are held to be responsible for most of their actions. Indeed, virtually all cultures in all historical periods seem to have had some conception of human agency which, in the absence of certain responsibility-defeating conditions, entails such responsibility. Few philosophers have had the temerity to maintain that this entailment is trivial because such responsibility-defeating conditions are ... It is not very surprising that it was no less true in antiquity than it is today that adult human beings are held to be responsible for most of their actions. Indeed, virtually all cultures in all historical periods seem to have had some conception of human agency which, in the absence of certain responsibility-defeating conditions, entails such responsibility. Few philosophers have had the temerity to maintain that this entailment is trivial because such responsibility-defeating conditions are always present. Another not very surprising fact is that ancient thinkers tended to ascribe integrality to what is (to on). That is, they typically regarded what is as a cosmos or whole with distinguishable parts that fit together in some coherent or cohesive manner, rather than either as a unity with no parts or as a collection containing members (ta onta or things that are ) standing in no natural relations to one another. 1 The philoso- phical problem of determinism and responsibility may, I think, best be characterized as follows: it is the problem of preserving the phenomenon of human agency (which would seem to require a certain separateness of individual human beings from the rest of the cosmos) when one sets about the philosophical or scientific task of explaining the integrality of what is by means of the development of a theory of causation or explanation ( concepts that came to be lumped together by the Greeks under the term aitia ) .Taal: Engels;Formaat: ePub met kopieerbeveiliging (DRM) van Adobe;Kopieerrechten: Het kopiëren van (delen van) de pagina's is niet toegestaan ;Geschikt voor: Alle e-readers te koop bij bol.com (of compatible met Adobe DRM). Telefoons/tablets met Google Android (1.6 of hoger) voorzien van bol.com boekenbol app. PC en Mac met Adobe reader software;Verschijningsdatum: september 2015;ISBN10: 9400953399;ISBN13: 9789400953390; Engelstalig | Ebook | 2015.
8
Agency and Integrality: Philosophical Themes in the Ancient Discussions of Determinism and Responsibility (Philosophical Studies Series) (1985)
EN HC NWISBN: 9789027719683 bzw. 9027719683, in Englisch, 296 Seiten, 1985. Ausgabe, Springer, gebundenes Buch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigtes Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland, Usually dispatched within 1 to 2 months.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Amazon.co.uk.
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Amazon.co.uk.
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen
9
Agency and Integrality: Philosophical Themes in the Ancient Discussions of Determinism and Responsibility (Philosophical Studies Series) (1985)
EN HC USISBN: 9789027719683 bzw. 9027719683, in Englisch, 296 Seiten, 1985. Ausgabe, Springer, gebundenes Buch, gebraucht.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigtes Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland, Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days, exclusief verzendkosten (indien geleverd).
Von Händler/Antiquariat, rbmbooks.
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen
Von Händler/Antiquariat, rbmbooks.
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen
Lade…